Oct. 29, 2002 Online Since 1996 Vol 77 No. 16
Delegating responsibility for student actions

COMMENTARY
Jennifer Brannock

Sports Beat

   After having my roommate throw small objects at me in an attempt to stop my 10-minute rendezvous with the alarm clock snooze button, I begrudgingly stumble out of bed and routinely ponder the importance of class attendance policies.
    While this scenario is a regular occurrence in my morning wake-up ritual, and I expect most college students can relate, I almost always take the supposed “responsible route” and go to class with a mug full of caffeine and the bleary-eyed prospects of a new day.
    For some unknown reason, many professors and departments do not carry much faith in our self-motivation to go to class and feel the need to impose cursed attendance policies upon us blossoming adults.
    As incoming freshmen, we are exposed to the remarkable state of freedom that comes with not having parents dictate when you go to school, and as a result of this phenomenon, it is likely that college freshmen will skip out on a few classes to go enjoy the hooky-playing they were never privy to in high school.
    For this reason, the need for a loose attendance policy is obvious and, quite probably, essential. A light schedule to help new students get acclimated to college life may be the key to adapting them to a self-disciplined, successful scholastic career.
    As time wears on and freshmen grow into seasoned college students, the need for a set attendance policy becomes nearly obsolete. College is traditionally known as the intermission between high school and “the real world” and thus should prepare students for the situations they will inevitably face in the workplace.
    At no point in a professional career will your employer coddle you by enforcing an attendance policy. They keep it simple: You show up, you keep your job; you don’t, you’re fired.
    Perhaps you are not concerned with future employers, because you can never get a job interview. Boone is not exactly a hotbed of employment activity, and many upperclassmen find frequent day trips to larger cities during 8-5 business hours essential for the success of their career quests. If future employment is one of the main goals of an educational institution, does it not stand to reason that classes should not hinder the intent of their initial creation?
   In a period of student overflow and the raising of college entry standards, college has the potential to play an imperative role in the separation of students dedicated to furthering their education from those simply in college to pacify their parents. Students who will make an impact on the school, and the world, will embrace their education and have the ability to decipher the necessity of their own class appearances.
    Grades exist as a measured means of assessing a student’s mastery of a subject and, whether they are reflective of a student’s progress or not, should not be affected by class attendance.
    The abolition of a class attendance policy would eventually serve as a self-disciplinary tool for educators, who would strive to keep their classes full by implementing useful information to benefit attendees.
    College should not resemble its predecessor, high school, which was mandatory for every adolescent age 5-16. College should reflect a genuine willingness to receive an education and further scholastic growth, which students, their parents or the government pay exorbitant amounts of money to fund.
    Failing economies create a need for serious people to step up to the challenge of life and face it head-on with motivated goals and ambitions for the future. Society cannot be expected to hold the hands of students afraid to become adults and take the plunge into self-responsibility.
    Furthermore, if class attendance is not crucial for a student to succeed in the class, then serious questions should be raised concerning the value and necessity of the class in question excluding seminar classes, which should be measured by means of class participation, not attendance. Anyone can show up to a discussion class, but it takes a truly involved learner to contribute a significant perspective to the class dialogue.
    Many professors sympathize with the plights of an upperclassmen attempting to break into the adult world, and either do not implement attendance policies or bend the rules for significant circumstances, but there are still those who are blind to the theory that class sometimes interferes with education.
    To those who feel there is no excuse for missing their assuredly stimulating lectures, it is time to let students find their own path to success. It may include passing on a few dazzling class assignments, but they will learn for themselves, either in school, or in the “real world.”
   How students envision their futures is their choice, as well it should be for any mature, educated adult in today’s fast-paced work world. My advice: Cut the cord and let students sink or swim on their own.
Email Us