Sept 12,2002 Online Since 1996 Vol 77 No. 5
Our Perspective ... NOW picked the wrong time to protest

   Appalachian State University held its annual Walk for Awareness Sept. 3. The Walk for Awareness was started in 1990 to honor the memory of staff member Jeni Gray who was raped and murdered by a man in Boone and to honor Appalachian student Leigh Cooper Wallace who was raped by the same man.
    The Walk for Awareness activities now not only includes the silent, commemorative walk through the Appalachian campus and downtown Boone, but messages concerning sexual assault and safety.
    That night, however, the events also included a protest by members of the Appalachian State National Organization for Women (NOW) and members of the Boone-area NOW.
   NOW protesters argued the university-sponsored event is too controlled and far too quiet. Protesters said they felt any event meant to raise awareness about sexual assault should include raised voices and awareness is not heightened by walking in silence.
    NOW protesters preferred a more “in your face” approach to awareness by yelling and holding rape statistics on banners.
    They raise some notable points and their chosen method to educate people of rape statistics is one way to get the point across. But overall, it seems as far as the Walk for Awareness is concerned, they missed the point.
    Both the Walk for Awareness and NOW methods of protest are ways to raise the awareness and education of rape. NOW provided their information through shouts and chants; Walk for Awareness provided its information through messages from speakers and the reflection time during the silent walk.
    The silent walk is where NOW protesters missed the point. During the walk, protesters yelled, creating noise that distracted from the reverence and reflection of the walk. A time meant to silently commemorate the victims of rape and reflect upon the messages from speakers was interrupted by chants of rape statistics and protest against the silence of the event.
    The Walk for Awareness is essentially a protest as well. Participants in the Walk for Awareness walk in protest against rape. They walk to commemorate those who have suffered from the injustice of sexual assault, and they intend to inform themselves as to how to prevent becoming victims themselves.
    The point of the silent walk is to give participants time to reflect. It is difficult to silently reflect amidst loud noise. Yes, the protesters were yelling rape statistics, but their statistics were lost in the fact that someone was yelling. Participants did not necessarily hear the words of the protester’s shouts; they heard a loud sound that distracted them from reflection on what NOW was actually screaming about: rape.
    In their efforts to educate, protestors actually aided in neutralizing the effectiveness of the silent message of the Walk for Awareness.
    NOW may have had good points to make, but they chose the wrong time to make them.
Email Us