Thursday June 12, 2003 Online Since 1996 Vol. 77 No. 51

The Appalachian | News

Campus parking fees to increase 85 percent By by James Nix
Editor-in-Chief
   To make up for revenue lost in a recent court case and the debt on the newly built parking deck, Appalachian State University raised parking permit fees to $204 for the 2003-04 academic year.
    The Board of Trustees approved the $94 increase in their June 6 meeting.
    The fee for parking in the parking deck increased $4. A semester pass for the deck will only cost $210.
    The increase is due to the loss of approximately $600,000 in parking citations because of a recent court decision to uphold a clause in the state constitution that mandates any fines issued by a state agency must be turned over to the county’s school board.
    The Appalachian Parking and Traffic Committee proposed a plan to charge faculty and staff one half of one percent of their salary to park.
    For example, faculty and staff members earning $20,000 a year would pay $100 to park. Those earning $100 thousand a year would pay $500 to park.
    Former Student Government Association president Ryan Eller said Friday to the BOT Business Affairs committee that SGA supported the parking and traffic committee’s proposal because it would be fair, mainly to the lower income employees and students that have to park on campus.
    Under this suggestion, students would pay a flat fee of $156 to park.
    “[The parking and traffic committee] came up with this because the felt it would be the most fair to everyone,” said Rachel Johnson, the newly appointed Student Government Association president.
    Jane P. Helm, vice chancellor for business affairs, said the payroll reduction method would not be fair in the sense people would be paying different amounts of money for the same parking spot.
    The committee suggested the student fee because it was divisible by 12 and would allow a student to buy a parking pass at any point during the year, Johnson said.
    For the Rivers Street Parking Deck, the committee recommended a $4 increase.
    Under the committee’s recommendation, evening passes would cost $78, one-half of the student rate.
    Also recommended was the addition of $1 to all event tickets where people must park on campus.
    Helm, said she feels taxing athletic and cultural affairs events would hurt the programs.
    “Basically you would be taxing the same people who are already paying for the parking deck,” she said.
    Dr. Paul Gates, chair of the Faculty Senate said he feels there are other sources of income to be tapped before raising the parking fee.
    Not all parking expenses are incurred by faculty, staff and students. Cultural events in Farthing Auditorium and athletic events draw in large number of off-campus motorists.
    “It seems to me these costs should be spread among everybody who parks and not put just on faculty, staff and students,” Gates said.
    Parking should be factored in on the cost of putting on an event, Gates said.
    The only paid parking during athletic events is the parking deck. Raley and Stadium lots are both available for free parking.
    During home football games, Stadium parking lot is reserved for Yosef Club members, but the Yosef Club does not pay the university for the parking, Gates said.
    Lower paid staff and some students will be hit hardest by the increase, Gates said.
    The state legislature is discussing a 1.81 percent raise for all state employees, Gates said. A typical lower paid staff position earns $20,000 a year. The 1.81 percent raise would add $362 to their salary. The $94 parking fee increase equals 26 percent of that raise.
    “Ninety-four bucks is about 26 percent of that,” Gates said. “That’s a good chunk of a small raise.”
    Gates said the Faculty Senate will explore other options next year to help lower the fee.
    “What I would like to see is the parking costs not remain at this level,” Gates said. “I don’t think they’ll have to if we get revenue from all sources.”
    Gates said he sees no blame to be assigned to the administration, however.
    “We’re being caught between an adverse court decision and the debt service on the new deck,” he said. “This is just an unfortunate confluence of circumstances, but when we are caught in this squeeze, we’ve got to look to all possible sources of revenue.”
Contact Us