April 8, 2003 Online Since 1996 Vol 77 No. 44
Rejoice for being able to use freedoms Dr. Matt Robinson
Asst. Professor, Criminal Justice
robinsnmb
To The Editor:
   Based on recent letters to the editor from our current and former students, we, the faculty of Appalachian State University, are failing to provide a liberal arts education to at least some of our students.
    Many of our students are incapable of expressing informed opinions, forming reasoned ideas and engaging in critical thinking. This is truly sad given how hard we work to help our students develop and use these abilities.
    The letters I refer to deal primarily with the war on Iraq, claiming that anti-war protesters do not “support our troops” and are “unpatriotic.” The letter writers say we should not question President Bush but rather should just fall in-line with whatever policies he promotes.
    A liberal arts education should allow our students to observe the obvious contradictions in the above assertions. It should also allow students to understand that just because we do not support specific policies of our government does NOT mean that we are unpatriotic, that being patriotic does NOT require pledging unquestioned allegiance to our leader, and that it is possible to be against a war and still “support out troops.”
    Personally, I want all of our students to rejoice whenever they see ANY gathering of citizens utilizing their constitutional freedoms. Even if you disagree with what the group is lobbying for, consider what makes America so great is that they have the right to assemble peacefully and express their opinions.
    Consider this irony: we are fighting battles in Iraq in “Operation Iraqi Freedom” so Iraqis can enjoy the same freedoms that we enjoy, yet you want Americans not to practice those same freedoms?
    It is past time for our students move beyond parroting talk show rhetoric. This is inconsistent with the liberal arts education taxpayers provide.
   
Comments will reflect on your country Michelle Thick
Graduate Student
thickm
To The Editor:
   This is in reply to Jana Nordstrand’s column “Patriotic while studying overseas, staying safe,” April 3.
    As an English student at Appalachian I object to the final statement made by Ms. Nordstrand in her column.
    I agree that many English people are not happy at being dragged into a war by Tony Blair against the wishes of the majority of population and indeed his own party. But from conversations with my friends and family in England I know that people are rallying behind our troops.
    Just because many British people do not agree with George W. Bush this does not make them anti-American, and I would be deeply ashamed of anyone who would attack all Americans because of the policies of their government.
    However, it is comments like “unlike many people in England, at least I know all the words to my national anthem,” that provokes anti-American feelings in people. Ms. Nordstrand seems to have forgotten that ASU does have a large international community and, therefore, I was not the only person who was offended by her comment. Ms. Nordstrand needs to remember that she is an ambassador for her country while abroad and the impression she makes on people will reflect on her country.
    However, if she continues to make comments that only show her immaturity and stupidity she will have brought any hostilities on herself.
   
SGA helps students, tries to do right thing Stacie Harris
Freshman
SGA senator
266-4006
To The Editor:
   I am a senator for the Student Government Association. Some of the members of minority religious groups are upset at how SGA decided to postpone the voting on a bill that would allow for certain religious freedom. These people do not realize that we helped them because, without a rules report, the administration would not look as highly on this bill.
    Also, what they need to realize is that there is a campus-wide rule not to allow candles in residence halls. This rule will not be changed in the course of this year alone.
    If it is passed it will not even be put into place until next fall. So the one week that we had to put it off is only going to help and you will have to wait the same amount of time, no matter if we did it last week or this week or even next week.
    I do not think that many people on senate disagree with the bill or will oppose it when we vote on it we are just trying to do what is right.
   
Soldiers fight for our right to freedom Daniel Inman
Student
DI32011
To The Editor:
   As a former and current student of Appalachian State University and member of the Armed Forces, I want to throw my two cents in the mix.
    I have been deployed for two months causing me to put my entire life on hold for a fight with which I do not totally agree.
    Yet, I am a proud member of the Armed Forces and have been for several years.
    As this is my second deployment, I would like to stress the fact that this not only changes me, the soldier, it changes my friends, family and loved ones as well.
    I will not be the same person when I get back that I was two months ago.
    I would like to thank the editorial board for writing the April 8 Our Perspective “Support our troops, even if not the actions,” because that is how the majority of soldiers in my current unit feel. People around the country and the nation treat us like we are beneath them, and yet we fight for their right to say and do as they please.
    Without us, the citizens of our country would be like those of so many countries, just striving to get by. For without us, there could be no United States of America.
   
Ignorance must stop, support our right Eli Ferrari
Sophomore
EF54063
To The Editor:
   This is in response to the March 27 letter to the editor, “Ignorance must stop, support Bush.”
    Being an American is being able to support any side of the spectrum he or she wishes. Protesting with signs on a corner is part of a person’s right to express himself.
    The government is not a separate entity to the citizens but a representation to protect each person’s natural rights.
    Why is a sign stating “How many deaths for oil?” not a valid question? Oil may not be the full reason for this war but it will be part of the aftermath.
    Since troops and citizens on both sides have been killed in this war, oil is a part of it.
    I support the troops over there and support them by wanting them home and away from danger. The leaders waging this war are what I do not support. That is my right.

Email Us