Mar. 20, 2003 Online Since 1996 Vol 77 No. 40
Student Senate votes against war on Iraq
David Forbes
SGA Beat

Josh Brown | Chief Photographer
Members of HCSPJ attended Tuesday evening’s SGA meeting to show support of an SGA bill approving actions of the United Nations.
   The Student Government Association passed a bill Tuesday night calling on the United States to work with the United Nations (U.N.) on the Iraq conflict.
   The bill, which passed 23-17-3, supports the United States government working with the U.N. Security Council on inspections, rather than invading Iraq. Copies of the bill will be forwarded to state and national representatives.
   “By acting outside of the U.N., the United States is acting outside of international law,” off-campus senator Stephen F. Barker, the author of the bill, said. “We, the [United States], should lead by example in the international community and not rewrite the rules.”
   Some senators objected to the bill’s relevance.
    “I have trouble with the irrelevancy of this bill and the increasing irrelevance of the body,” off-campus senator Aaron M. Whitener said. “Why do we continue debating issues like this instead of things that actually affect the students?”
    “Who can believe that attacking Iraq will not foment more anti-American sentiment and more terrorist attacks here at home?” Barker said. “I think this issue effects Appalachian students pretty directly, war affects us all, whether it’s as trivial as higher gas prices or as life-changing as being actually deployed to the region.”
    A group of protestors held up signs in support of the bill in the back of the room as the debate went on.
    “We have more people in this room than we’ve had in a long time time. I’d like to point out that there were 300 signatures on a petition on this issue done in the student union,” off-campus senator Heather A. Robertson said. “That’s a lot more input than most bills have.”
    Other senators strongly objected to the bill’s content, supporting a United States-led war on Iraq.
    “Inspections in Iraq do not work,” John C. McDonald, senator from Gardner Residence Hall, said. “We’ve seen that for 12 years; we know [Saddam Hussein] has the weapons, even the French admit he has them. Are we going to let that tyrant, who has killed more Muslims than any other person on this planet, have his way? The answer is no, and we’re going to go in and stand up for what’s right in this world.”
    “I don’t like war, I don’t know of anyone who does. But sometimes its necessary,” Christian H. Greve, senator from Justice Residence Hall, said. “Nothing’s going to change without military action.”
    However, despite the strong opposition, the majority of senators ended up supporting the bill.
    “The best way for us to support our troops is not to unnecessarily put them at risk. We’re endorsing pre-emptive attacks illegally, dividing the international community in a way that’s unprecedented, and destroying alliances we’ve had for hundreds of years,” senator Paul A. Funderburk said. “Containment [of Iraq] works and has worked for the past 12 years. We’re about to start a cycle of violence.”
    “Basically, this war’s coming whether we want it or not, even though this resolution is kind of irrelevant at this point, it still supports the U.N. and whether the war comes or not we still need to stand for peace,” Howard R. Schreiber, senator from East Residence Hall, said.
 

Email Us