|
COMMENTARY
Time
has come to make a stand on tuition
David
Forbes
Tomorrow is the
day. The University of North Carolina system Board of Governors will
be meeting in Chapel Hill to decide the fate of a series of tuition
hikes, including one at Appalachian that would amount to student tuition
almost doubling next year.
The question iswill you be there?
For about a month now, The Appalachian has been covering the proposed
tuition hike extensively. Since there is no cost whatsoever to pick
up the paper, the only way the student body could not be
informed about whats been going on is by simply being lazy.
However, for those of you who are just tuning in now, heres a
quick refresher course.
The latest tuition hike is $150; ostensibly the funds it generates will
be used to help the lowest paid staff through the current state budget
crisis. On top of increases that have already been proposed, this brings
the total tuition increase to about $919 next year, and this is before
the 4.8 percent statewide increase the Board of Governors will probably
approve. Dr. Gregory Blimling has refused to say the hike would be rescinded
when the budget and salary of staff was back to normal rates, and no
plan has been articulated to even make sure the money will be reaching
the staff year after year.
The Student Government Association, your elected representatives, have
unanimously declared their opposition to this increase. The Faculty
Senate has refused to support the tuition hike. William C.
Friday, former president of the University of North Carolina system,
has referred to the trend of rapidly increasing tuition as dangerous.
Oh yeah, one other thing, the state constitution mandates affordable
tuition.
Got all that?
To freshmen and sophomores like myself, this issue is even more important.
Not only are the underclassmen the largest percentage of the student
body, but if this proposed hike succeeds, and the trend of massive tuition
increases continues, we will be the ones paying for it over the next
three years.
Now, what can you do about it?
The SGA is organizing a protest for the BOG meeting tomorrow. The more
students involved in that protest, the more we can make it clear the
student body of Appalachian knows about this issue and will not quietly
sit still while our tuition is hiked to absurd levels for dubious reasons.
The SGA is providing transportation to Chapel Hill; anyone interested
can meet at 9:30 a.m. tomorrow in the Stadium parking lot.
Talk to your professors if there are tests or labs you would be missing.
When I did so this past Friday I found most of them sympathetic and
willing to work with me to find ways I could make up the lost time.
When MTVs Road Rules came to this campus, crowds of
students, up to 5,000, turned out to scream at the top of their lungs.
While I doubt that any issue of real importance at Appalachian could
draw the same turnout, even half that number at the BOG meeting tomorrow
would make an impression that would be hard to ignore.
If this increase passes, I will no doubt hear students grumbling next
year over their tuition prices, students who failed to do or say anything
when the issue was still in the process of being decided.
Our generation has been accused countless times of being uninformed
and apathetic. Heres our chance to show otherwise.
Is
tuition hike proposal really about staff?
John Bennett
A logjam of campus-based
tuition increase requests will headline the docket of tomorrows
University of North Carolina system Board of Governors meeting as the
body will approve or kill an unprecedented 13 such requests.
However, the BOG will not have the same luxury the Appalachian State
University Board of Trustees enjoyed during a conference call vote last
month when that body approved the proposal.
Joining the BOG tomorrow on the systems flagship campus will be
student protestors from at least 11 of the 13 system institutions set
to ask the board to up tuition next year.
The Appalachian State Student Government Association is putting the
finishing touches on plans to join this anti-tuition hike show of force.
Like this publications editorial board, SGA has come out against
the proposal based on the fact staff salary improvements in North Carolina
have always been funded by the General Assembly.
This plan would transfer that responsibility onto the shoulders of students,
something former UNC system President William C. Friday recently told
The Appalachian should never occur. Friday went on to add the recent
trend of rising tuition in North Carolina is both dangerous and unprecedented.
On the surface, this publication and SGA could be misconstrued as greedy
and uncompassionate because of our unified front against this proposal.
However, there is no one from either organization who does not feel
for the hardworking staff members at this university.
The simple truth is these hardworking individuals who clean laboratories,
classrooms and keep the campus running smoothly on a daily basis are
the backbone of Appalachian State.
As we go about our daily activities it is easy to look past the vital
role these essential workers play. That is a practice we must end.
Just as the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks raised the nations collective
appreciation for firefighters and police officers, if the debate over
who should fund staff salary hikes does nothing else it should lead
students and faculty to give a tip of the hat to these often overlooked
members of the Appalachian State community.
There is no doubt students take staff members for granted, but the cold,
hard truth is the Appalachian State University administration and the
N.C. General Assembly have overlooked these individuals for years in
terms of salary rates.
These staffers have been toeing the poverty line for years, yet the
Appalachian State administration chose to sit idly by and allow their
collective financial plight to continue.
University officials did not come forward with a plan to boost these
salaries via a tuition hike until the institutions budget had
been slashed some 7 percent by state lawmakers.
The timing of this proposal cannot be ignored.
Appalachian State officials have told The Appalachian if and when the
state recovers from its current financial situation and is able to fund
these salary hikes they do not plan to rescind this $150 tuition hike.
If these much-needed funds are solely meant for salary improvements
and the state can one day assume its responsibility and fund those raises,
why would this proposed tuition increase remain in the universitys
tuition base?
Simple, because the truth beneath the rhetorical surface of this proposal
is a growing appearance that this plan has little to do with staff members
and their low pay rates.
From my perch, it appears the administration is merely using these hardworking
individuals as a means to achieve the greater end of fattening university
coffers.
As if that was not vile enough, their grand plan is to use student dollars
to achieve that aim.
If the BOG condones this mindset it will indeed be a dark day in the
still-unfolding history of Appalachian State University.
OUR
PERSPECTIVE

Allocation
conundrum
Appalachian State
University officials are still scrambling to finalize an allocation plan
for monies that would be generated by a proposed $150 tuition increase.
This last minute planning comes with the University of North Carolina
system Board of Governors set to vote on the Appalachian request tomorrow.
In what will be an unprecedented day in the history of the University
of North Carolina system, the governing body will approve or kill similar
campus-based requests from 12 other system schools.
If approved, the Appalachian State increase would be used for select staff
salary improvements and financial aid. However, detailed guidelines for
how many Appalachian workers that fall under the State Personnel Act and
are paid through state allocations would be eligible for a pay hike, as
well as a specific blueprint for how the funds would be allocated, has
yet to be formulated by university administrators.
The administrations plan is further flawed in that it would transfer
the financial burden of those salary raises from the N.C. General Assembly
to the pockets of studentsa dangerous precedent in a state that
has long abided by a constitutional mandate that tuition be kept as affordable
as possible.
Despite the ongoing conundrum that is this yet-to-be finalized allocation
plan, the University Board of Trustees approved the measure last month.
That body acted just days after the Faculty Senate opted to withhold its
endorsement of the plan and the Student Government Association Senate
unanimously passed an anti-tuition hike bill.
As the clock counts down to the BOGs decision on this overly vague
and unjust tuition increase proposal, university officials have yet to
go public with anything more than a rhetorical promise the generated funds
would be channeled to salary hikes for the institutions lowest-paid
employees and need-based financial aid.
The universitys practice of setting policy in a secretive manner
undermines the principles of a democratic nation.
The same argument was made just last week when Senate Majority Leader
Tom Daschle chastised the Bush administration for moving forward with
the global war on terrorism without an unambiguous explanation of its
aims.
I think there has been expansion without at least a clear direction,
Daschle told The New York Times in Fridays edition.
The same advancement of policy without a clearly defined and fully disclosed
plan has been and remains at play as Appalachian State leaders rush to
finalize the allocation plan, a move that should have been completed prior
to the unveiling of the tuition proposal early last month.
A final stamp of approval by the BOG and the legislature would condone
the Enron-esque practices that have surrounded the development of this
proposal.
By voting down this flawed proposal tomorrow, the BOG would send the following
messages:
Student tuition should never be used as offsets to the states
financial woes.
Failure by university administrators at a state-supported institution
of higher learning to publicly disclose a detailed plan for how the generated
monies would be distributed is irresponsible and unacceptable policy making
and simply will not be tolerated.
A BOG approval of the Appalachian request would show a shakeup in the
leadership of the UNC system is among North Carolinas most imminent
needs.
|
 |
 |