|
COMMENTARY
Apathy and MTV
- is that all we stand for?
Looking back through
history, it is evident that each generation stood for something. Whether
it was pioneers struggling to create a new and better country, young
men and woman dying for a country they believed in, or students who,
unprecented, fought for the rights they held dear, these generations
started at a young ageour age.
After contemplating this thought, I asked myself, What does my
generation stand for? After some of the conversations I have had
these past couple of weeks and the display of immaturity and absurdity
I witnessed during the MTV extravaganza, I am concerned for the mentality
of our generation.
I honestly do not see anything wrong with getting caught up with the
recent MTV excitement. I admit, I think it is pretty cool that our once
little-known Appalachian State University will be featured on a popular
television show.
However, I believe the behavior of my peers surrounding the MTV excitement
reflects their mentality about life, and that scares me.
For example, I was not impressed by the seemingly amusing attempts of
some of the students to gain probably two seconds of so-called fame.
I felt it was immature for some of my fellow students to jump in Duck
Pond without paying the $25 (Come on, guys, it was for charity!). Why
are we so obsessed with the chance of appearing on television? Perhaps
it is the bragging rights, but it seems to me there must be something
in life more worthwhile than appearing on Road Rules.
Then there was the whole incident sparked by those who thought it was
worthwhile to vandalize the Road Rules RV. The only thing
accomplished by that was the message that students at Appalachian State
are not only immature but also disrespectful. (However, I do give props
to the person from WASU who stuck a bumper sticker on the RVthat
was not exactly vandalism, and quite clever!).
I was also not impressed by the behavior of the Road Rules
cast, who are our peers and who also represent our generation. Maybe
I am old-fashioned, but I do not think it is inspiring when someone
rips off her thong and throws it into a crowd.
Even if the MTV craziness was, in my opinion, a little annoying and
a reason for concern over the mentality of our generation, I think the
anti-MTV protesters disgusted me even more. It is great when students
want to stand up for their beliefs and/or exercise their First Amendment
rights. However, there are better concerns and more worthwhile issues
on which to spend our time and energy. Why waste our time with trivial
MTV productions?
Maybe if more students took the time to inform themselves about campus
issues such as the facets of the proposed tuition increase or how they
can affect the facultys decisions concerning their education and
actually attended Student Government Association meetings, we would
care more about our university than we do about whether or not
MTV is cool.
Regardless of MTV, the lack of available knowledge some of my fellow
students have also calls for concern for our generation.
Last week, a student asked me about the work I was doing for the paper.
As I tried to explain to them some of the research I was doing about
the proposed tuition increase, I shuddered at the response I received:
What tuition increase? Not only has the newspaper covered
the proposal almost the entire semester, but SGA made an attempt to
distribute information and inform students about the situation at hand.
It is not just campus issues, but also national and world issues some
of my peers remain ignorant about. During this past week, more than
once, I tried to converse with my peers about current events and they
either had no idea about the events or they just heard about them from
somebody else.
Why do we keep ourselves so uninformed? Are we just apathetic or do
we focus our attentions on the trivial because it is seemingly more
fun and exciting?
Not only are our generations immature mentality and ignorance
causes for concern, but also our reckless behavior. While our generation
remains notorious for being wild and rebellious, several of us are hurting,
even killing, ourselves and we do not even realize it.
Nothing is wrong with having fun, but if we live our lives for temporary
and fading cheap thrills, what impact will our generation make?
Of course, not every one of my peers thinks immaturely, remains ignorant
and behaves recklessly, but the several that do create a downfall for
our generation and, I believe, for themselves.
If we can stay informed, stay focused and live for what is impacting,
long lasting and even eternal, maybe our generation can find something
positive to stand for.
Construction
zones lack key element: Work
So Im driving
down Rivers Street through the usual traffic. Up ahead by the Holmes
Convocation Center, I can see that theres some congestion.
Suddenly the right-hand lane that Ive been driving in has been
abruptly cut off, with construction barrels blocking the lane, without
even any road signs to alert drivers prior to it happening.
I have to try to get into the left lane, but no one is being very gracious
about letting me in.
I dont mind construction on roads, particularly if its to
widen them or repave them. If thats the case, Im all for
it.
What I do mind is when those big orange and white construction barrels
get placed out on the road, blocking one of the lanes at one of the
busiest intersections around the Appalachian State University campus,
and no construction or repair has occurred.
That lane and part of 321 at that same traffic light have been blocked
off for well over a month now, and not one bit of work has been done
on those roads.
All that those construction barrels have succeeded in doing is creating
a traffic jam in a part of town where too many cars have to go through
every day.
Highway 321 is a mess in its own right, but at least at the intersection
by King Street, theyre actually doing something with the part
of the road thats under construction and is blocked off by construction
barrels.
Its when you get farther down 321, toward the Rivers Street stoplight,
that things get ugly for no reason.
The white lines that separate the right lane from the left have been
scuffed up, so that it appears as though construction will take place
at that area any day now.
However, it has been that way ever since the barrels were put up over
a month ago and nothings happened yet.
If the road needs repairs, fine. If the construction company needs to
do some preliminary measuring before they actually begin to widen or
repair the road, thats fine too.
That, I can understand.
But there is absolutely no reason for both Rivers Street and 321 to
be one lane at that traffic light for over a month and for not even
the slightest bit of construction to occur there. Boone is congested
enough and has enough of a traffic problems as it is without making
roads one lane and not doing anything on the lane thats blocked
off.
OUR PERSPECTIVE
Perilous
precedent
The
list of players choosing not to support a proposed $150 tuition increase
aimed at boosting select staff salaries at Appalachian State University
grew by one late last week.
The Student Government Association passed a bill opposing the plan, and
the Faculty Senate opted to withhold its endorsement of the proposal.
Both bodies acted earlier this month.
The latest figure to voice concern over an administration-spawned plan
that would add to a recent statewide tuition hike trend is one of the
most respected leaders in the realm of higher education.
Former University of North Carolina System President William Friday told
The Appalachian the skyrocketing cost of tuition at UNC system institutions
is dangerous and unprecedented.
Tuition rates have climbed 134 percent across the Tar Heel State since
1990. That jump was intensified when the UNC system Board of Governors
adopted a new tuition policy in 1998.
Since it was implemented, the BOG has interpreted the policy loosely,
approving 11 campus-based tuition hike requests in the last two years.
When the BOG meets March 6, 13 of the 16 system institutionsincluding
Appalachianwill petition the board for a tuition hike.
[UNC system officials] are making costs so great that families with
bright children dont even try to go to college, said Friday.
If approved, the $150 tuition increase would drive student tuition at
Appalachian to $1,581 next fall, a level $599 higher than the fall 2000
mark.
Friday helped mold the 16-member University of North Carolina into a model
system during his 14-year tenure in part by staunchly adhering to a state
constitutional mandate that a college education be as affordable as possible.
It is clear Friday sees educating the states young people as the
systems top priority and realizes they are the future leaders of
North Carolina.
Conversely, it is becoming apparent that Chancellor Francis T.
Borkowski and his administrative colleagues have lost sight of that fact
due to a series of state budget cuts, and now view Appalachian students
more as a means of generating monies for university coffers.
Borkowski in effect told the University Board of Trustees while he did
not like the fact the precedent of yearly campus-based tuition increase
requests had developed, it had already been set and the administration
felt the institution had no option but to cash in.
With the state financial situation not expected to improve next year,
the possibility of another tuition hike request from Appalachian is almost
guaranteed based on Borkowskis comments during the trustees
Feb. 15 conference call.
In short, state legislators and their UNC system counterparts have busted
the tuition dam wide open, sending a dangerous and unprecedented tidal
wave sweeping across the state.
But instead of attempting to rebuild that dam, Appalachian State officials
seem content to aid in destroying any hopes many low- and middle-income
young people in North Carolina had to afford a college education.
Sending young people to college is very important to the state,
and its not happening, said Friday. Were disadvantaging
people.
Given the dangerous precedent this $150 tuition hike would set by transferring
a costly state budgetary burden to students, it seems Appalachian State
officials are not at all concerned with whom or what they disadvantage.
Following their mindset, so long as Appalachian coffers are bulging the
future of the North Carolina can suffer.
That approach embodies the definition of dangerous.
|
 |
 |