|
COMMENTARY
Valentines
Day: Why do we need this day?
Janelle Silverman
As the second week
of February rolls around, we look and see it is that time of year again.
The heart decorations, mushy cards, candy, flowers and Cupids
arrows either hitting or missing their target of true love.
Whether single or in a relationship, the holiday just sets off a bad
vibe.
Maybe I am alone in my convictions this holiday is depressing and pointless,
or perhaps there are other people out there who share my unenthusiastic
view of Feb. 14.
To me, Valentines Day is just an excuse for all the card shops
and novelty stores around the country to give men and women a reason
to spend money.
If you really care about someone, why should there be only one specific
day out of the year to let him or her know?
Of course, like every other holiday there is some sort of history behind
Valentines Day. However, it is no surprise no one really knows
the real reason we celebrate it.
For example, there is the tale of St. Valentine, a priest who performed
secret marriages that were outlawed by the authority and therefore was
thrown into jail for helping young lovers.
If this tale is true, where does Cupid come in? Why do we send each
other candy and flowers or sentimental cards?
The corny poems and conversation hearts are enough to make anyone avoid
love and relationships at all costs. Valentines Day encourages
the experience of revealing your feelings for someone who obviously
does not reciprocate those same feelings of love or lust. The fact you
were shot down on the love day of the year makes you feel
even worse than you would on any other normal day.
I hated this holiday even more as a child when we were required to give
every person in the class a valentine card, even if you hated their
guts. Doesnt that completely go against everything this day is
supposed to be about?
This may sound like I am completely against true love and spending time
with that one person who makes you feel wonderful about yourself. That
is far from the truth.
I do not need a special day to tell someone I love them or send them
gifts or go out to dinner. There are 364 other days of the year in which
I try just as hard to show my affection.
Valentines Day just makes people in relationships feel obligated
to go out and spend money on each other and say I love you
at all the right times and makes those who are single feel like the
loneliest people on the planet.
To those of you who enjoy Feb. 14, may you find your true love or celebrate
with the one you are with.
To those who would rather forget this day exists, may you find a way
to get through it happy, unaffected and glad that one more year must
pass before Cupid strikes again.
Internships
have their good, bad points
Kristina
Egger
In theory, participating
in a summer internship program is a wonderful idea. In contrast, to
participate in an internship you first have to find one that suits you.
Next, you have to decide if you can afford it. Then you have to compile
a resume, interview for the position and pray that someone lets you
in the door.
If you do your job well, interning can boost your resume, open job opportunities
and help prepare you for your future career; at least, thats what
they say.
Aside from the aforementioned reasons, a summer internship would help
clarify what I want to do when I graduate. Hopefully the experience
of living and working in a new environment would assist me in determining
a direction for my life. More importantly, in the midst of a soft job
market, interning may be the deciding factor as to whether or not I
am extended a decent job offer after graduation.
On the downside, first there is the time one must spend to find an internship.
If you are fortunate enough that your parents already have connections
in your field of study, thank your lucky stars. The rest of us will
have to spend hours surrounded by manila envelopes, sticky tabs and
e-mail addresses we anxiously scribbled on the back of old receipts,
searching for a job. We are faced with dead end after dead end after
dead end. Then maybe well find something that works out.
Even if you are finally blessed with an internship, you have to decide
if you can afford it. Many internships are unpaid, because experience
is all the payment you need, right? Well, that is not exactly true when
you are stuck paying rent at two places. You could always try to find
a summer subleaser, but do you really want a stranger living in your
room? Do you want to move all of your stuff out for the summer only
to have to move it all back in? If you decide to sublease, you then
have to spend the time to find someone to take your spot.
This goes without mention of the credit card bills you wanted to pay
off this summer by working, in an attempt to harness your debt before
graduation. What do you do about the summer school classes you wanted
to take in order to graduate on time? When you talk to a counselor about
the exciting world of internships, these factors arent really
taken into consideration.
Any amount of experience that you can take with you into the job market
is good experience. I dont mean to complain, but I wish it didnt
all have to be so difficult.
OUR PERSPECTIVE

ENRONomics
The Appalachian State
University Board of Trustees will discuss a proposed campus-based tuition
increase in a Friday conference call.
Because the teleconference will be considered a formal meeting of the
universitys governing body, the panel could vote on the proposal
at that time, said Student Government Association President Xan Harrington.
The administrations proposal calls for a $150 tuition hike to bolster
the salaries of a select number of Appalachians lowest paid employees
who fall under the State Personnel Act and are paid through state-funded
monies.
Students have rightly expressed concerns over the universitys tidal
wave of tuition hikes over the past few years, pointing to the massive
potential of a 71.4 percent hike in tuition since the 2000-2001 academic
year.
The proposal has also come under fire from students, faculty and staff
because it would fund salary hikes for state employees with money generated
from student tuition, a fiscal responsibility for which we feel
students should not be burdened.
The Faculty Senate tabled a motion Monday that would have endorsed the
proposal, a move we feel only magnifies the questionable nature of several
aspects of the plan.
With such a mounting disapproval rate, it would be irresponsible of BOT
members to effortlessly settle on this defective and unjust tuition hike
plan.
Harrington told the SGA Senate Tuesday evening the decision to schedule
a vote Friday was simply a political tactic by university officials.
Because I was having conversations with other Board of Trustees
members lobbying for the student interest, they decided to speed it up
and make a conference call for this Friday, said Harrington. There
is a little bit of politics coming into at play.
Approving an increase proposal on which members of the university community
have not even been fully informed of the details is merely the latest
development in what is rapidly beginning to take the form of a highly
questionable, ultra-secretive effort on the part of the administration
to garner the needed approval to implement the tuition increase.
Also, since the administration first unveiled the proposed hike to the
SGA senate last month, university officials have yet to provide a breakdown
of how many SPA employees would be eligible for salary hikes or clear
guidelines for how those dollars would be distributed.
If implemented in its current form, the increase proposal leaves too much
room for fiscal irresponsibility.
The flawed nature of the proposal and the secretive nature of the specifics
on how it will be implemented conjure up visions of the kind of mismanagement
and backroom decisions that brought down corporate giant Enron.
In comparable fashion to the former Enron executives who ignored stockholder
and employee interests, the Appalachian administration has shown little
effort to ensure the proposal keeps the interests of the students paramount.
Using Enronomics to manage a public university is an unacceptable
practice.
The BOT must vote down this flawed proposal and put an end to these disturbing
Enron-esque practices.
\
|
 |
 |