The Appalachian | Archives | 2000-2001

This Issue: News | Sports | Opinion | Entertainment
The Appalachian - 262-6233
Boone, NC 28608
July 19, 2001

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Opinion

Our Perspective ...

Convocation center facilities should be open as planned

The Convocation Center has been a topic of discussion on campus ever since the delayed opening in January.

Officials had plans to allow students, faculty, and staff to use the indoor track, just as any other recreational resource on campus.

This, however has not been the case, and the indoor track is still closed to all recreational users. Officials have listed reasons why access has been limited. These include the concession stands do not have lockable gates and the arena does not have gates barring access from the track / concourse area.

The concession stands and arena have expensive equipment that could be damaged without proper supervision but provisions should have been made to foresee these issues.

Gates and doors should have been installed to limit access to areas of the center that are off-limits during non-event times.

If the use of the track was planned from the beginning, why are officials now using the excuse of no shower / changing facilities to keep the track locked?

Also, concerns have been raised about the location of the restrooms in relation to the track. Reportedly, while some cross country runners were running on the track, some collided with construction workers who were entering and leaving the restrooms.

Scan card doors should be installed to allow access to the those with permission.

The track is not banked so runners may have a hard time going around curves safely. If this is an issue now, why wasnÕt the track banked?

When the Geoge M. Holmes Convocation Center was being constructed, students waited anxiously to utilize their new building. Now, however, we are being restricted from using a facility from which we should all benefit.

When many people have good ideas about a building on campus, the ideas should be looked at combined to see what would work in the area and what would not.


Letters to the Editor

More flexibility is in order for required classes

To The Editor:

I would like to say that I loved Brian StevensÕ commentary in the July 12, 2001 issue. After reading this column though I had to respond. I too have had difficulty with AppalachianÕs class requirements. I am a transfer student who took a few years off from school to work. I took College Algebra at my original college my freshman year. When I got here, I found out that I was required to take the Math Placement Test. I would not be taking anymore math and had previously completed, and received transfer credit for, the only math course required for my major and remaining core courses. I questioned this since I had already been credited the only math required of me. I had not had math in a few years at this point and knew that I would not pass the placement test. That meant that I was forced to take a class that I did not need, that does not count towards anything for me. I wasted a summer session that could have helped me in my major. This policy is like telling a grown man that he must go back to riding a tricycle before he can ride a mountain bike, simply because he has not been on a bike in three years. I understand the need for placement tests and required courses. There should be flexibility to handle situations like mine, so that students do not have to repeat the hurdles they have already cleared.

Melissa Jeter
Sophomore
MJ39501


 

 

 

 

Americans remember the Ôroyal familyÕ

COMMENTARY - Kristin Davis

Two years have passed since the ominous morning when the world awoke to mass coverage of a search off the coast of MarthaÕs Vineyard. Flowers piled up outside a Manhattan apartment, helicopters flew high and low, and the President issued a statement. America grew somber; those old enough felt a pang of grave familiarity, and the younger population tasted the bitterness of trepidation.

John F. Kennedy, Jr. was missing. The toddler who emanated the full grief of his fatherÕs passing to the world with his pious salute was nowhere to be found. He was a grown man nowÑAmericaÕs prince with his motherÕs gentle disposition and his fatherÕs legacy. KennedyÕs plane, on the way to a wedding and carrying his wife and sister-in-law had disappeared from radar into a thick haze over a choppy sea.

Instead of celebration, family members were swallowed up in grief and disbelief, and the flags were lowered to half-staff. Soon the massive search and rescue would dissipate into search and recovery, and the world would begin mourning for hope lost, a life cut short, and another tragic end in the Kennedy clan. Days after the initial search had begun America allowed itself to lament the death of young Kennedy when his plane was discovered resting on the ocean floor.

Still we mourn. Still the sadness consumes many of us when media images flash through our mindsÑmemories of the hot sun on an uneven sea, the hovering helicopters, and the growing despondency of the newscasters. We wanted him to come home and tell us all it was a bad joke. It could not be real. Not again. Now we somehow smile through the pangs of Òwhat-might-have-beensÓ when stations rebroadcast their interviews and coverage of a handsome man full of wit and promise.

John F. Kennedy, Jr. was our parentsÕ hope, a small right in a world of wrong, an innocent being in a world of carnage and change. And he was our dream. He was our link to a past we could only imagine, a part of our history that we could not touch.

It is little wonder we mourn still. His death was more than an end of life. It was the loss of a volatile thread to our past, an unexpected end to our wishes and recollections. Time passes and the wounds close, but there exists an ever-present tenderness that leaves us susceptible when another anniversary happens upon us, no matter our age or past.

Kristin Davis is a Staff Writer. She can be reached at: theapp@appstate.edu.


Cars provide convenience, but at what cost?

COMMENTARY - Craig Cox

The traffic issues in and around Boone during the summer months make me thankful that I donÕt have to drive my car regularly.

A funny thing happened last week while on the way to my family reunion: my car broke-down. Despite the expense of repairs and not making it to Atlanta for the reunion, IÕm thankful for my breakdown. The truth is, cars are really just a huge headache that minimizes our happiness while rushing us through life with tunnel vision.

There are a few situations that can induce me to scream curse words and most occur within the confines of the driver seat. Two situations that nearly all of us have encountered pop into mind. The first is going across town for something important only to be delayed for an hour because a minor traffic incident occurred fifty cars ahead on the highway.

The other is getting behind a slow diver on the many two lane roads in and out of Boone.

For instance, letÕs say IÕm coming back to Boone from home on a Sunday afternoon up highway 321. I am at peace with the world, cruising along, listening to Dave Mathews Band. The car in front of me is going a little over the speed limit, and thatÕs good enough for me. Eventually the road changes from four lanes to two and suddenly the car in front of me slows to way under the speed limit. Now cyclists are passing us on the shoulder and there is no chance for me to pass for miles. I begin to get uncomfortable in my seat, which soon degenerates into yelling and extensive horn use.

I hate feeling this volatile, but I have noticed I become upset at other drivers frequently. I am not alone with these feelings however. Friends are constantly commenting on road rage, expressing how much driving in general frustrates them. Why do we put ourselves under this stress?

Cars put a drain on money and resources. Consider, for instance, spending $20 a week on gas will total $1040 per year. Add in five oil changes, $400 in monthly payments and insurance and unexpected repairs, and costs for the yearly use of a car can reach upwards of $7000. Imagine what these costs would add up to over a lifetime.

These costs surely put increased pressure over our heads to make more money, but the real issue at hand is the way our great mobility has increased the speed of life beyond what produces the greatest happiness. The expression Òstop and smell the rosesÓ is exactly what IÕm ÒdrivingÓ at.

In our world, we drive the kids to school, then to work, drive to lunch, drive back to school, drive around town for errands before finally driving home. We spend a great deal of time in our cars, driving, waiting at lights, and in traffic! Cars have shaped the way we live our lives.

Cars certainly produce things such as pollution, resource depletion and increased global greed. This is well documented, but the reason an average American should resist car use is that it reduces the overall happiness one can experience in life.

Was life, in all its complexity, meant to be spent inside the confines of an automobile? I donÕt want to spend my life in traffic!

The great American road trip is so much fun, as is the Sunday drive into the countryside. Automobiles can be fun, and useful, no doubt about it. The day-to-day grind of constant driving to and from points A and B is what I wish to discourage you from falling victim to. Live close to the places you travel often and this will reduce or eliminate your driving time, and thus increase your happiness.

Craig Cox is a Staff Writer. He can be reached at: theapp@appstate.edu.


 

 

 

Return to The Appalachian