COMMENTARY
Rental
textbook system offers few benefits
Gerald Witt
The textbook
rental system, something many believe to be beneficial, actually
puts Appalachian State University students at risk of falling behind.
In comparison
to other colleges and universities, our textbook fees may be considerably
lower, but the positive aspects end there.
For example,
each semester at Appalachian that I have endured has brought me
increasing costs for non-rental textbooks and lower usage for the
rental textbooks issued for my classes.
Often, a professor
will tell the class that the book we are supposed to be using (as
determined by the department) is crap. If they don't say that, chances
are the reason for us not using rentals are that they are out-of-date.
If professors
consider rented books useless, would not the $60 we spend to rent
be better put to the textbooks we must buy in lieu of the ones that
are rented?
With the exception
of my first semester in the fall of 1998 (when I spent $80), I have
yet to go under the $100 threshold for textbook purchases. That
$60 would have been pretty handy in purchasing some books I would
actually use.
According to
legislation recently passed by the Student Government Association,
93 percent of the student body supported book rental in a random
survey. This is contrasted by a decision by Faculty Senate that
said they disagree with the current system.
Faculty Senate
would be much better suited to decide whether we should buy or rent
books from the school, as they are the professionals who teach us.
They know more than we do and we pay tuition to learn from them.
With professors' extensive knowledge about their respective subjects,
I think they could do a better job picking our textbooks. Under
the rental system, we take that decision out of their hands.
In a world where
information changes daily (this is especially true for science,
technology, political science and communication majors), a two-year
old book may not be adequate.
In addition
to changes in particular fields, textbooks themselves have changed.
Some books now come with correspondence software, a necessary supplement
that can be lost or damaged through the rental system. Someone who
owns the book will take better care of it and any additional components
in order to sale it back for a better price.
How about the
benefits for the local economy? If we dropped the rental system,
bookstores would flourish in Boone, including the one on AppalachianŐs
campus, which holds a tight grip on the current university-student
book market.
As a side note,
I typically buy my books online as a result of the bookstore being
the only true bookstore here. Usually you can find all the books
you need at a cheaper price; a contrast to the University Bookstore,
which occasionally runs out of some titles.
This addition
of bookstores would add jobs and increase Appalachian's visibility.
At campuses that do not have rentals, bookstores off campus sell
memorabilia in addition to required texts. At those campuses (UNC
Chapel Hill, Virginia Tech, and East Carolina University come to
mind) people sport their school colors much more often. Usually,
those colors are bought at the beginning of the semester, with books,
in bookstores.
Our bookstore,
while it does sell Appalachian wear, does not do it in conjunction
with books. A person must stand in one line to buy books, another
to rent books, then negotiate a flight of stairs and handle another
line to get a T-shirt, hat or any other Appalachian wear.
Switching from
the textbook rental system would do more for this university than
any new construction. Our education level will improve with expanded
options for our instructors and ourselves, a new market will open
in Boone and our pride in Appalachian will grow.
To say textbook
rental is an overall benefit to the university and its members is
to accept mediocrity.
|